Alex Barrena vs Daniel Siniakov Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• How does second serve performance compare between the players? Barrena has maintained a 42.55% win rate on recent second serves, while Siniakov edges slightly ahead with 43.55%.
• Return game effectiveness indicates Barrena wins 48.33% of opponents' second serve points, compared to Siniakov's 52.7%. For first serve returns, Barrena's success rate is 32.74%, trailing Siniakov's 33.64%.
• When under pressure, Barrena saves 54.18% of breakpoints, whereas Siniakov performs marginally better at 55%.
• Overall match win percentage over the last year suggests Siniakov has the edge, securing victories in 65.22% of their games compared to Barrena’s 61.67%.
• Barrena's career win rate is highest on clay surfaces at 56%, while they struggle on hard courts at 27%. Siniakov excels on hard courts with a 63% win rate, but is less successful on clay at 49%.
• In terms of playing level, Barrena is more experienced in Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, whereas Siniakov often competes in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, boasting a higher victory rate of 70% compared to Barrena's 59.38% at their respective levels.
• Barrena's opponents have an average ranking of 373.4, whereas Siniakov faces tougher competition averaging a rank of 254.65.
• If the match reaches a deciding set, Barrena has an advantage, winning 60% of those sets compared to Siniakov’s 57% success rate.
• Recent form in breakpoint conversion strategies shows Barrena capitalizing on 38.1% of opportunities, while Siniakov converts significantly fewer at just 23.08%.

Editorial Prediction (May 27, 2025, UTC):

Both players display strong second serve performances and return games, though Siniakov has a slight edge in both areas. Their ability to save breakpoints is also comparable, yet Siniakov consistently displays better handling under pressure situations.

Siniakov's higher overall win percentage this year, combined with facing higher-ranked competition, suggests greater adaptability and resilience in various match conditions. Their effectiveness on hard courts further supports their strength against opponents, although Barrena's performance on clay is noteworthy.

When examining breakpoint opportunities, Barrena's significantly higher conversion rate provides a potential area of advantage, especially in critical match moments.

Ultimately, while Barrena's strengths in breakpoint conversion and clay surface performance are notable, Siniakov's consistent performance metrics, better opponent quality, and strong baseline game make them the favored contender to win this upcoming match.